The Middle East Conflict and Financial Markets

Introduction

Global financial markets have entered a period of heightened volatility and risk aversion following an intense escalation in the Middle East involving an attack by the United States and Israel on Iran on Saturday. Coordinated military strikes by U.S. and Israeli forces against Iranian targets, including the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, prompted swift retaliation from Tehran and a broader regional response. What began as geopolitical tension has now spilled over into multiple asset classes, reshaping investors' expectations and financial market behaviour worldwide.

Global Equities: Broad Sell-Off and Risk Aversion

One of the most immediate reactions to the conflict has been a sharp sell-off in risk assets, especially equities.

On Wall Street, stock futures fell sharply as traders priced in greater uncertainty and the possibility of broader economic disruption. Contracts on major benchmarks such as the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones all show declines at market open, with futures trading down by about 0.8% to 1%.

Regional markets reflected similar patterns. Asian shares were mixed, with Tokyo's Nikkei down over 1% while some Chinese and Southeast Asian markets showed varied movements. In the Gulf, trading was even suspended entirely in the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange and the Dubai Financial Market for precautionary reasons, highlighting the extreme stress in local financial systems.

Equity indices in Europe and elsewhere also declined. The Stoxx Europe 600 is down around 1.8% and other major European benchmarks also slid as oil prices spiked and investors tightened risk exposures.

Overall, the equity sell-off reflects investor caution amid forecasts that an extended conflict could dampen economic growth prospects and increase input costs across global supply chains. There is a possibility of declining sentiment linked to higher inflation risks and slower corporate earnings momentum.

However, keep an eye on sector rotation trends. Energy and defence stocks are showing relative strength, benefiting from higher oil prices and anticipated increases in defence spending. Conversely, sectors such as travel, consumer discretionary, and financials faced heavier selling due to economic uncertainty and cost pressures.

Oil: Supply Fears Propel Prices Higher

Energy markets have been among the most directly affected by the conflict, with crude oil prices rising sharply on concerns over supply disruptions.

Oil benchmarks such as Brent crude (FXCM: UKOIL) and West Texas Intermediate (FXCM: USOIL) surged as much as 13% in early trading but have declined off highs. UKOIL briefly topped around $82 per barrel, its highest level in over a year, before settling slightly lower while still maintaining substantial gains.

A key driver of this surge is fear over disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway through which roughly 20% of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas supplies transit daily. Reports indicate that shipping traffic in the region has been reduced, rerouted, or halted entirely due to security risks, raising the potential for bottlenecks in energy flows.

This risk premium has not just lifted prices in the moment but also reshaped market expectations. Many analysts believe that sustained instability could push crude well beyond current levels if key chokepoints remain unsafe. Some estimates suggest prices could move toward $95–$110+ per barrel in a prolonged crisis scenario, especially if the Strait of Hormuz is effectively closed or insurers withdraw cover for shipments.

For many oil-importing countries, higher energy costs act like an added tax, increasing production costs, fuelling inflation, and reducing consumer disposable income. In markets that rely heavily on imported crude, this dynamic can erode equities as sectors sensitive to energy prices adjust earnings expectations.

See also: https://www.fxcm.com/uk/insights/us-and-israel-strike-iran-whats-next-for-oil-markets/

Gold and Other Safe-Haven Assets Soar

As equities falter and oil prices climb, investors may be turning towards traditional safe-haven assets, especially gold.

Gold prices jumped strongly, with bullion rising more than 2% and climbing toward multi-week highs above $5,400 per ounce. The surge was driven by heightened geopolitical uncertainty and safe-haven demand as traders seek capital preservation over return.

Gold's appeal in times of geopolitical risk is well documented. It tends to serve as a hedge against market stress and currency volatility. In this conflict environment, elevated gold prices reflect both outright demand and hedging behaviour by institutions and retail investors alike.

Other precious metals like silver also saw gains, though generally with more volatility compared to gold. These moves underscore a broader trend in asset flows away from riskier assets and toward instruments perceived as store of value.

The U.S. Dollar Strengthens Amid Risk-Off Moves

Currency markets reacted rapidly to the conflict, with FXCM's USDOLLAR instrument strengthening against a basket of global currencies. In times of risk aversion, the dollar often benefits due to its status as the world's primary reserve currency.

Safe-haven demand elevated the USDOLLAR, pushing it upward as other currencies, particularly those of emerging markets, weakened. For example, investors trimmed exposure to currencies like the Indian rupee and other risk-sensitive units as capital shifted toward liquidity and relative safety.

The dollar's resilience was further supported by its role in global trade and finance, especially as higher oil prices and geopolitical risk heightened demand for liquidity in the world's largest economy.

A Market Shaped by Risk and Uncertainty

The financial market impact of the Middle East conflict reveals a clear pattern - risk assets are retreating, safe havens are rallying, and commodity prices are climbing.

Investors are reassessing risk, reshaping portfolios, and pricing in scenarios where geopolitical instability remains elevated for weeks. Markets are signalling that continued conflict, especially if it disrupts energy supplies, could have deeper implications for inflation, economic growth, and monetary policy.

While markets are always forward-looking, the current wave of selling and repositioning underscores how swiftly geopolitical events can translate into financial adjustments. Equities and risk assets are likely to recover if clarity and de-escalation emerge, but for now, markets are pricing in uncertainty.

References

  • bloomberg.com
  • reuters.com
  • timesofindia.indiatimes.com
  • financialexpress.com
  • moneycontrol.com

Russell Shor

Senior Market Strategist

Russell Shor is a Senior Market Strategist at FXCM, having been promoted to the role in 2025 in recognition of his depth of insight and consistent delivery of high-impact market analysis. He originally joined FXCM in October 2017 as a Senior Market Specialist.

Russell holds an Honours Degree in Economics from the University of South Africa, is a certified FMVA®, and a full member of the Society of Technical Analysts (UK). With over 20 years of experience in financial markets, his work is renowned for its clarity, precision, and strategic value across asset classes.

${getInstrumentData.name} / ${getInstrumentData.ticker} /

Exchange: ${getInstrumentData.exchange}

${getInstrumentData.bid} ${getInstrumentData.divCcy} ${getInstrumentData.priceChange} (${getInstrumentData.percentChange}%) ${getInstrumentData.priceChange} (${getInstrumentData.percentChange}%)

${getInstrumentData.oneYearLow} 52/wk Range ${getInstrumentData.oneYearHigh}
Disclosure

Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices, other information, or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an "as-is" basis, as general market commentary and do not constitute investment advice. The market commentary has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and it is therefore not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of dissemination. Although this commentary is not produced by an independent source, Friedberg Direct, FXCM or its affiliates takes all sufficient steps to eliminate or prevent any conflicts of interests arising out of the production and dissemination of this communication. The employees of Friedberg Direct and FXCM commit to acting in the clients' best interests and represent their views without misleading, deceiving, or otherwise impairing the clients' ability to make informed investment decisions. For more information about the Friedberg Direct's internal organizational and administrative arrangements for the prevention of conflicts, please refer to the Firms' Managing Conflicts Policy. Please ensure that you read and understand our Full Disclaimer and Liability provision concerning the foregoing Information, which can be accessed here.**

Past Performance: Past Performance is not an indicator of future results.

Order Execution Only

Order Execution Only

Regulatory Documents:
CIRO: Avoiding Fraud and Protecting Your Investments, How CIRO Protects Investors, CIRO Complaints Brochure, CIPF Brochure, CIPF Coverage Policy, CIRO Order Execution Only Bulletin, Conflict Disclosure Statement, Covid-19 and Cyber Security - Tips for Investors, Relationship Disclosure Information Document, Notice of Acknowledgment, Before You Begin Trading

The relationship between Friedberg Direct and FXCM was formed with the purpose to allow Canadian residents access to FXCM's suite of products, while maintaining their accounts with a regulated Canadian firm. All accounts are opened by and held with Friedberg Direct, a division of Friedberg Mercantile Group Ltd., a member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO). Friedberg customer accounts are protected by the Canadian Investor Protection Fund within specified limits. A brochure describing the nature and limits of coverage is available upon request or at www.cipf.ca.

* The percentage of our retail client accounts that were profitable in each of the previous most recent quarters was: Quarter 4, 2025: 41% | Quarter 3, 2025: 41% | Quarter 2, 2025: 34%. These figures are provided for transparency purposes only and do not constitute an indication of future performance or results.