What Is The Blockchain?
The blockchain is a distributed ledger system that makes it easier to keep track of transactions and assets. While the first blockchain was rolled out for use with the digital currency bitcoin, it has since been used for many other cryptocurrencies. Technologists have speculated that this distributed ledger system could have a wide range of uses from storing property records to enhancing transparency in the sharing economy.
Blockchain and Digital Assets
In addition to the aforementioned potential applications, the blockchain is already used by myriad digital assets.
Many organisations have held initial coin offerings (ICOs), which are similar to initial public offerings but distribute digital tokens to investors instead of more traditional securities such as stocks and bonds. When an ICO takes place, all transactions are recorded on this digital ledger system, providing a permanent record of who has owned what and when.
Some digital assets have produced very strong returns. The total market capitalisation (market cap) of all cryptocurrencies rose from roughly £13.1 billion at the start of 2017 to more than £130 billion in September of that year—an increase of more than 900% in less than nine months.
Given all of this, it's important for potential investors and those interested in cryptocurrency to learn more about the blockchain.
When it was created, the blockchain used cryptography to create a secured, digital ledger that was spread across many different computers. All transactions recorded in this way were time-stamped, providing greater transparency.
At the time of report (22 September 2017), more than 9,000 nodes (computers) were running bitcoin software.
The first blockchain was immutable, meaning that transactions could not be erased once they were recorded. The bitcoin protocol—the set of rules used for the creation and use of bitcoin—ensured this immutability.
Bitcoin's blockchain represents a series of blocks. Each block contains several bitcoin transactions that have been processed by miners. Once these transactions have been recorded, they cannot be removed. By providing a ledger that was not only decentralised, but also immutable, the blockchain helped safeguard against fraud.
It is worth noting that while bitcoin's blockchain was set up to be immutable, not everyone agrees that all distributed ledger systems should be immutable.
For example, Accenture released plans to create a type of blockchain that users could "edit" or revise, reasoning that such features could be quite helpful for enterprises. More specifically, it was stated at the time that providing this ability to edit the blockchain would make it easier to address new regulations like the "right to be forgotten." Further, it would give businesses the ability to fix otherwise-immutable mistakes left on the blockchain that resulted from human error.
Bitcoin's blockchain was designed to make the digital currency's transaction history available to the public, a feature that provides greater transparency by making transactions open to any and all interested parties. However, it's worth keeping in mind that while bitcoin's blockchain offered this clarity, not all such distributed ledger systems are public.
Some blockchains are private, meaning that they are not available to the public and their membership can be controlled by a central party.
For instance, a company may set up one of these distributed ledger systems on an enterprise-wide basis. A perfect example of this would be a financial services institution that uses one of these distributed ledger systems to keep track of transactions. Because the transaction is private, only a limited number of parties need to know its details. The presence of a blockchain can provide an immutable ledger accessible only to certain people.
Generally, private blockchains set up by businesses in this way will be permissioned, meaning that all users must obtain permission to join. The central party can invite potential members to the blockchain and then decide to approve them or have them conform to specific rules to join.
By restricting the use of a blockchain to those granted permission, a central party (for example, a company) can derive multiple benefits.
- For starters, an organisation that uses a permissioned blockchain has greater options, in that they can either permit—or prevent—individual entities from making transactions or being able to read the ledger.
- Additionally, operating a permissioned blockchain can make it easier to ensure data integrity.
- Further, harnessing one of these ledgers could potentially increase the chances that users will follow all relevant regulations regarding data privacy, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
Smart contracts are another possibility that exist because of the blockchain. These are agreements that are automatically fulfilled as soon as specific requirements are met. The idea was originally proposed by Nick Szabo, a computer scientist and cryptographer.
"A smart contract is a set of promises, specified in digital form, including protocols within which the parties perform on these promises," he wrote.
One major platform that allows for these contracts is ethereum. More specifically, the ethereum platform was designed to leverage these contracts. Through this platform, developers could potentially build decentralised applications (or "Dapps") that use smart contracts.
A blockchain could potentially be compromised if one or more miners consolidated 51% of the network's computational power (or "hashing power") in order to launch a "51% attack" and manipulate the distributed ledger system. If this took place, the miner or miners could stop transactions from being confirmed. This would invalidate the transactions, which would then prevent users from sending bitcoin to one another. Such an event could enable the miner(s) to reverse transactions, which would consequently result in double spending.
Theoretically, a 51% attack could also go back in time and change prior transactions, though doing so would be very difficult.
Another potential risk to existing blockchains is hard forks, which create a permanent change in a digital currency's protocol. Basically, once a network implements a hard fork, the blockchain won't accept blocks using the prior protocol.
The ethereum platform, for example, underwent a hard fork in the summer of 2016 after a distributed organization named The DAO was compromised. This resulted in the loss of a larger number of ether tokens. This hard fork returned the funds back to the original investors, but it had an unintended consequence.
While the hard fork caused the original ethereum to follow a different protocol, some cryptocurrency enthusiasts continued mining using the previous rules. This caused a network split, resulting in a new and separate blockchain called "Ethereum Classic."
The blockchain is a distributed ledger system that makes it easier to keep track of transactions. The first blockchain, which was rolled out to go along with bitcoin, was immutable. Being both decentralised and immutable helped safeguard against fraud.
The first blockchain was also public, which made its transactions available to anyone interested in learning more. Not all blockchains were set up this way. Some were created to be private to restrict the access of certain parties.
While some technologists, industry participants and market observers have stated that the blockchain could be used for a wide range of potential applications, it is important to keep in mind that these distributed ledger systems are vulnerable to 51% attacks.
FXCM Research Team
FXCM Research Team consists of a number of FXCM's Market and Product Specialists.
Articles published by FXCM Research Team generally have numerous contributors and aim to provide general Educational and Informative content on Market News and Products.
Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices, other information, or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an "as-is" basis, as general market commentary and do not constitute investment advice. The market commentary has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and it is therefore not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of dissemination. Although this commentary is not produced by an independent source, FXCM takes all sufficient steps to eliminate or prevent any conflicts of interests arising out of the production and dissemination of this communication. The employees of FXCM commit to acting in the clients' best interests and represent their views without misleading, deceiving, or otherwise impairing the clients' ability to make informed investment decisions. For more information about the FXCM's internal organizational and administrative arrangements for the prevention of conflicts, please refer to the Firms' Managing Conflicts Policy. Please ensure that you read and understand our Full Disclaimer and Liability provision concerning the foregoing Information, which can be accessed here.